1- age of consent in canada is 16 unless you are in an authoritarian position such as a cop or teacher. a supervisor doesn’t count. 2- if she didn’t like what was happening she was free to find a new job. how much could he have been paying her that she couldn’t find another place to work? 3- hasnanything been proven in court? no.... this is a case of high school level he said/she said a d everythhing should be taken with a gra of salt. 4- did he force them to take drugs? no.... you can always say no. we are taught this at a very young age. 5- should he have been exposing himself at his home to her? yes and no..... yes it’s his house and should be free to do what he wants... no because you are not intimate with this person so why show them your junk?6- “he gave shoulder rubs and would talk sexually explicit” who cares. could she have said as an excuse “can you not rub my shoulders? it kind of hurts when people do it”. when he would make sexual comments say “thanks (in a sarcastic tone)” or “i have a boyfriend” at the end of the day, these people let this happen to themselves. he didnt rape anyone and he didnt force drugs down anyones throats. just because you have regrets 10 years later doesn’t mean he is fully to blame. have some accountability for your actions, him included.
In 1880 the American stage mentalist Washington Irving Bishop published a book revealing how mediums would use secret codes as the trick for their clairvoyant readings. The Seybert Commission was a group of faculty at the University of Pennsylvania who in 1884–1887 exposed fraudulent mediums such as Pierre L. O. A. Keeler and Henry Slade. The Fox sisters confessed to fraud in 1888. Margaret Fox revealed that she and her sister had produced the "spirit" rappings by cracking their toe joints.